Legal Opinion

United States v. Pruitt

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 15, 1968No. 20,511PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused stands convicted by a special court-martial of bigamy, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. In affirming the findings of guilty, the board of review divided on whether the instructions “failed to provide the court with rational factors with which to evaluate the honesty and reasonableness of the accused’s mistake.” • A majority of the board of review concluded the instructions were adequate. In pertinent part, the instructions in issue are as follows:

“. . . We have heard evidence, gentlemen, introduced…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  2. United States v. NoeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  3. United States v. McCluskeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  4. United States v. AcfalleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  5. United States v. PhillipsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. McFarlinU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  2. United States v. TuckerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  3. United States v. RodriguezU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1979
  4. United States v. LeeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API