Andrew Mascarenas v. The State of Wyoming

VOIGT, Justice.

[11] The appellant, Andrew Mascarenas, was convicted of felony driving while under the influence of alcohol, reckless driving, driving with a suspended license, and driving without an interlock device. He appeals these convictions, arguing that his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated and the State failed to present sufficient evidence to support the reckless driving conviction. 1 We affirm.

ISSUES

[12] 1. Did the appellant receive his constitutional right to a speedy trial?

2. Did the State present sufficient evidence to support the appellant's reckless driving…