Jason Christopher Durkee v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAUTZ, Justice.
[¶1] Jason Christopher Durkee was convicted after a jury trial of driving while under the influence of methamphetamine and aggravated vehicular homicide based upon recklessness. He claims his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated because 687 days passed between the initial charges and his trial. Applying the test from Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 92 S.Ct. 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972), we conclude the delay did not substantially impair his right to a fair trial. We, therefore, affirm -Mr. Durkee's convictions.
ISSUE
[¶2] Mr. Durkee presents the following issue on…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Moore v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harvey v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Byron Nelson Griggs v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Mathewson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- Webb v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Bradley Ross Fairbourn v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- State of Maine v. Nicholas W. NorrisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.