Legal Opinion

Gabriel Augustine Tate v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 24, 2016No. S-16-0006PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Justice.

[¶1] A jury found Gabriel Tate guilty of numerous counts of first.degree sexual assault, of battery, and of unlawful contact without bodily injury. He appeals those con-victiops, claiming that certain statements he made while in custody should have been suppressed because of a Miranda violation. He also contends that he was not provided a speedy trial. We affirm.

ISSUES

[¶2] 1. Did the district court err in denying Tate’s motion to suppress statements he made to a nurse during a sexual assault examination?

2. Was Tate denied a speedy trial as required by W.R.Cr.P. 48 and the Sixth…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Moore v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mathewson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Webb v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Kelly James Person v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Phillip D. Cotney v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Eduardo Vlahos v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API