Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Waletzke

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 5, 1989No. C7-89-816PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

The trial court denied appellants’ motion for a new trial and this appeal follows. See Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 103.03(d). We affirm.

FACTS

On December 27, 1986, appellant Erna Johnson was driven to a grocery store by her husband, appellant Arthur Johnson. They parked their car in one of the diagonally-striped parking spaces, with the car facing west. Cars in the lot generally parked nose-to-nose in such spaces. Erna got out of the passenger side, walked behind her vehicle and passed an empty parking space and headed south 'toward the shopping center.

Respondent Madonna Waletzke…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Flom v. FlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Hagsten v. SimbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  3. Westling v. HolmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
  4. Tiemann v. Independent School District 740Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Lenz v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. International Financial Services, Inc. v. FranzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API