Legal Opinion

Lenz v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 24, 1963No. 38,833PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

Appeal from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

Plaintiff’s suit for personal injuries is based upon claims of negligence asserted against the operators of two motor vehicles. When plaintiff had presented his case in chief with respect to the issue of liability, the court granted a dismissal of plaintiff’s action and subsequently denied his motion for a new trial. The question presented is whether the evidence could support a finding of negligence.

The essential facts established by the evidence, which we view most favorably to the plaintiff, are without…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hanson v. Homeland Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Downey v. FreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. Johnson v. WaletzkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Kleman v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API