Legal Opinion
PBA Local No. 38 v. Woodbridge Police Department
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 22, 1991No. Civ. A. No. 89-3314 (MTB)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARRY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs PBA Local No. 38 and John P. Schreck, et al. bring this class action against the Township of Woodbridge, its, police department and former mayor, the former and present director of police, and various telephone and electronic companies. Plaintiffs’ class is comprised of all police officers who worked for the Woodbridge Police Department from 1964 to the present, as well as family members and associates who visited or telephoned police headquarters, who were allegedly subjected to illegal surveillance by the department.
More specifically,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Denney v. Deutsche Bank AGCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Liberty Lincoln Mercury, Inc. v. Ford Marketing Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- PBA Local No. 38 v. Woodbridge Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
- Weikel v. Tower Semiconductor Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- In re Amaranth Natural Gas Commodities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.