Legal Opinion
In re Amaranth Natural Gas Commodities Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 27, 2010No. 07 Civ. 6377(SAS)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs filed this putative class action on behalf of futures traders that purchased, sold, or held natural gas futures or options on futures contracts between February 16, 2006 and September 28, 2006 (the “Class Period”). Plaintiffs allege that during the Class Period, the Amaranth Defendants manipulated the prices of New York Mercantile Exchange (“NYMEX”) natural gas futures contracts in violation of sections 6(c), 6(d), and 9(a)(2) of the Commodity Exchange Act (the “CEA”) and the remaining defendants were secondarily…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. CurranSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Denney v. Deutsche Bank AGCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In re Libor-Based Fin. Instruments Antitrust Litig.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
- Stinson v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- In re Commodity Exchange, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- In re Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- In re London Silver Fixing, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.