Legal Opinion

Anglo-Dutch Petroleum International, Inc. v. Greenberg Peden, P.C.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 26, 2011No. 08-0833PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hecht

Chief Justice JEFFERSON, Justice JOHNSON, Justice WILLETT, and Justice GUZMAN joined.

The parties dispute whether an attorney fee agreement is ambiguous. The client contends that an agreement on law firm letterhead, signed by a lawyer on behalf of the firm, is with the firm, not with the lawyer personally. The lawyer counters that his use of personal pronouns in the agreement, as well as surrounding circumstances, create an ambiguity that must be resolved by a jury. We agree with the client and therefore reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.1

I

Scott V. Van Dyke, president of Anglo-Dutch…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. CBI Industries, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Schlumberger Technology Corp. v. SwansonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. New Ulm Gas, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1951

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. Uri, Inc. v. Kleberg Cnty.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Pathfinder Oil & Gas, Inc. and Cathlind Energy, Llc v. Great Western Drilling, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Rsui Indemnity Company v. the Lynd CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. First Bank v. BrumittTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Kachina Pipeline Company, Inc. v. Michael D. LillisTexas Supreme Court · 2015

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API