Legal Opinion

Comer v. Ammons

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 16, 1999No. COA98-1441PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYNN, Judge.

In 1998, our General Statutes allowed a nominee for a superior court judgeship to run for another elected office during the same election. The plaintiff argues that the laws that allowed the defendant judges in this case to simultaneously run for a superior court judgeship and a district court judgeship were unconstitutional. We uphold the constitutionality of those laws and therefore affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant judges.

I. Statutory History

In 1996, the North Carolina General Assembly amended the State’s election laws to allow a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Rodriguez v. Popular Democratic PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 53 PeoplesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  5. State Ex Rel. Martin v. PrestonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kinesis Advertising, Inc. v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  2. Anderson v. AssimosCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Neier v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Anderson v. AssimosCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Comer v. AmmonsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API