Legal Opinion

Stephens v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of Mid-Atlantic States, Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 18, 2011No. Civil Action RDB-11-1603PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge.

Pending before this Court are Plaintiff James S. Stephens’ Motion to Remand (ECF No. 21), and a Motion to Stay (ECF No. 10) filed by Defendants DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson, Inc. Stephens filed suit against Defendants Kaiser Foundation Health Plan of the Mid-Atlantic States, Inc. (“Kaiser”), Mid-Atlantic Permanente Medical Group, P.C. (“Mid-Atlantic”), Johnson & Johnson, Inc. (“Johnson & Johnson”), DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (“DePuy”), and Chesapeake Surgical, Ltd. (“Chesapeake”) in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Tapscott v. MS Dealer Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Smith v. HendricksDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
  2. Carmine v. PoffenbargerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
  3. Sullivan v. Calvert Memorial HospitalDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
  4. Tinsley v. StreichDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2015
  5. Claytor v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2016

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API