Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hendricks

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 22, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2015-1226PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge

Plaintiff Vicky Smith brought this action in the District of Columbia Superior Court against Defendants Dr. Frederick Hendricks, Medical Faculty Associates, Inc., 1 and Boston Scientific in relation to injuries that she allegedly suffered after she was implanted with the “Advantage Transvagi-nal Mid-Urethral sling system.” Compl. ¶27. Defendant Boston Scientific subsequently removed the case to this Court. Plaintiff brings medical malpractice claims against MFA and against Dr. Hendricks (collectively, the “Healthcare…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
  4. Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nytes v. Trustify, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  2. Colon v. AshbyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Arenivar v. Manganaro Midatlantic, LLCCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  4. Colon v. AshbyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  5. Davis v. PaulsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API