Legal Opinion
Tinsley v. Streich
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided November 12, 2015No. Civil Action No. 3:15CV00043PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLEN E. CONRAD, Chief Judge.
In this action, which was removed from the Circuit Court of the City of Charlottes-ville, plaintiffs Daisy Tinsley, on behalf of herself and as guardian of her daughter, Kaylee Twyman (“Kaylee”), and Jermaine Twyman assert claims against defendants Heather Streich, M.D. (“Dr. Streich”), Gary Fang, M.D. (“Dr. Fang”), University of Virginia Physicians Group Inc. (“UVA Physicians”), Precision Dose Inc. (“Precision”), L. Perrigo Company (“Perrigo”),1 and Family Dollar Services Inc. (“Family Dollar”). This case is presently before the court on…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-LarrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Carmine v. PoffenbargerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2015
- Green v. Midland Credit Management, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2020
- Integrity Business Partners, LLC v. Autumn Ridge Consulting Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2022
- Jones v. WhiteDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2023
- Moore v. Blue Ridge Bankshares, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.