Legal Opinion
Lightle v. City of Washington Court House, Ca2006-08-033 (4-30-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided April 30, 2007No. CA2006-08-033PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-Appellants, Robert D. Lightle, Patricia W. Lightle and Aquatic Biome Conservancy Foundation, appeal the decision of the Fayette County Court of Common Pleas dismissing their action against the City of Washington Court House ("the City"). We affirm.
{¶ 2} Appellants Robert and Patricia Lightle ("the Lightles") own a 7.505-acre tract of "low flood plane [sic] land" situated along the east fork of the Paint Creek in Washington Court House. Within the property is a 3.05-acre portion that runs along the creek which the Lightles consider a "wetland." As such, the Lightles…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. AndersonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. CollierOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Hunt v. Marksman Products, Division of S/R Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Village of Hudson v. Albrecht, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. Hause, Ca2008-05-063 (2-9-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Oxford Mining Co., L.L.C. v. NallyOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
- State ex rel. Rodenberg v. GarvasClermont County Court of Common Pleas · 2007