Legal Opinion
State v. Collier
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 1991No. 90-2053PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlice Robie Resnick, J.
The issue presented for our review is whether R.C. 2925.11 is unconstitutionally void for vagueness. It is well established that all legislative enactments must be afforded a strong presumption of constitutionality. State v. Anderson (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 168, 566 N.E.2d 1224; State v. Klinck (1989), 44 Ohio St.3d 108, 541 N.E.2d 590; State v. Tanner (1984), 15 Ohio St.3d 1, 15 OBR 1, 472 N.E.2d 689. Moreover, if at all possible, statutes must be construed in conformity with the Ohio and United States Constitutions. See Tanner, supra, at 2, 15 OBR at 2, 472 N.E.2d at 690, citing R.C. 1.47.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- State v. HackerOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. WolfeOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- State v. HooverOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. NolingOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. LeetOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.