Legal Opinion
M. D. Rutledge v. Boston Woven Hose and Rubber Company, a Division of American Biltrite, Inc., a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 7, 1978No. 76-1231Published
1Opinion of the Court
576 F.2d 248
1978-1 Trade Cases 62,117
M. D. RUTLEDGE, Appellant,
v.
BOSTON WOVEN HOSE AND RUBBER COMPANY, a Division of American
Biltrite, Inc., a corporation, Appellee.
No. 76-1231.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
June 7, 1978.
Robert L. Wilson (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Douglas C. Conroy (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
Before MERRILL and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and THOMPSON,* District Judge.
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
1
This appeal arises from the dismissal of the second of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Dayco Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Dayco Corporation v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- M. D. Rutledge v. Electric Hose & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- M. D. Rutledge v. Boston Woven Hose and Rubber Company, a Division of American Biltrite, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Mt. Hood Stages, Inc., Dba Pacific Trailways v. The Greyhound Corporation and Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.