M. D. Rutledge v. Boston Woven Hose and Rubber Company, a Division of American Biltrite, Inc., a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises from the dismissal of the second of two antitrust lawsuits filed by plaintiff Rutledge against various hydraulic hose manufacturers and assemblers. Rutledge’s first suit was filed in 1969 against five hose manufacturers and seven hose assemblers alleging a price fixing conspiracy in violation of Sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act and price discrimination in violation of the Clayton and Robinson-Pat-man Acts. (Rutledge v. Electric Hose and Rubber Co. (C.D.Cal.1971) 327 F.Supp. 1267 (hereinafter referred to as Rutledge I).) The trial judge in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Dayco Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Dayco Corporation v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- M. D. Rutledge v. Electric Hose & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Mt. Hood Stages, Inc., Dba Pacific Trailways v. The Greyhound Corporation and Greyhound Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Rutledge v. Electric Hose and Rubber CompanyDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by116 opinions
- Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Gibson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- A. v. Costantini v. Trans World Airlines and Does I Through XcCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Aldrich v. McCulloch Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Volk v. D.A. Davidson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.