Legal Opinion

Portland Pendleton Motor Transportation Co. v. Heltzel

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLatourette, C. J.

This is a proceeding under the uniform declaratory judgments act brought by the plaintiff, a common motor carrier, against the defendant as Public Utilities Commissioner, to determine whether ch. 428, Oregon Laws 1951, relating to “motor transportation fees and taxes” became effective or operative on January 1, 1952, the date designated by such act as being the effective date of such act, or on November 4,1952, the date of the referendum election, wherein the people by vote approved said measure.

The plaintiff claims that the tax became payable not earlier than November 4, 1952, the date of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Caseday v. LindstromOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Arkansas Tax Commission v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. State Ex Rel. Elsas v. Missouri Workmen's Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  5. Sears v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. M. S. v. Kate BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. M.S. v. BrownDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2016
  3. American Energy, Inc. v. City of SistersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Tilbury v. Multnomah CountyOregon Tax Court · 1994
  5. Portland Pendleton Motor Transportation Co. v. HeltzelOregon Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API