M.S. v. Brown
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
AIKEN, Judge:
Plaintiffs filed suit purporting to challenge Oregon Ballot Measure 88, a referendum measure presented to and rejected by Oregon voters during the general election in November 2014. Plaintiffs contend that the rejection of Measure 88 violated their constitutional rights by arbitrarily denying them driving privileges based on their national origin, immigration status, and membership in a “disfavored minority group.” Pls.’ Compl. at 3. Plaintiffs seek class certification and declarations that Measure 88 “is void and unenforceable” and that defendants “are…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- M. S. v. Kate BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Jacobson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025