Legal Opinion

Portland Pendleton Motor Transportation Co. v. Heltzel

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1953Published

1Opinion of the Court

197 Or. 644 (1953)

255 P.2d 124

PORTLAND PENDLETON MOTOR TRANSPORTATION CO.

v.

HELTZEL, PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSIONER

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued March 4, 1953.

Affirmed March 25, 1953.

Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General of the State of Oregon, of Salem, and Lloyd G. Hammel, Assistant Attorney General, of Salem, argued the cause and filed briefs for appellant.

Moe M. Tonkon, of Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were John M. Hickson, William B. Adams and Wallace G. Mills, all of Portland.

AFFIRMED.

LATOURETTE, C.J.

This is a proceeding under the uniform declaratory…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kadderly v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Caseday v. LindstromOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Arkansas Tax Commission v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  4. State Ex Rel. Elsas v. Missouri Workmen's Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  5. Sears v. Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API