Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Elsas v. Missouri Workmen's Compensation Commission

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 4, 1928PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraves, J.

There are two cases in our docket involving the question as to when the Workmen’s Compensation Act became effective. Both have been assigned to the wi’iter. The other case is “The State of Missouri at the relation of Louis Lielcenstein, Relator, v. Missouri Workmen’s Compensation Commission, Alroy S/Phillips, Chairman, Evert Richardson, member, and Orin H. Shaw, member of Missouri Workmen’s Compensation Commission, Respondents,” and is our No. 28236.

We select the instant case (No. 28380) for the principal opinion, because the question therein is broader than in the other ease. The two eases…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Arkansas Tax Commission v. MooreSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  2. Stevens v. BensonOregon Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Woodward v. BarburOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Hammett v. HodgesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. Bradley v. Union Bridge & Construction Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1911

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Davis v. Research Medical CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Barker v. St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. State Ex Rel. Randolph County v. WaldenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  4. Tremayne v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  5. Elsas v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API