Legal Opinion
Lugosch v. Congel
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided October 17, 2003No. 00-CV-0784 (NAM/RFT)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
TREECE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiffs received from Defendant Moselle Associates (hereinafter “Moselle”) a redacted version of an investigatory report prepared by a criminal defense firm retained by this Defendant entitled, “Report On Pilot Bill Issues At the Carousel Center,” dated March 18, 2003. Now, Plaintiffs seek a copy of the investigatory report unredacted and all of the underlying documents and notes. Moselle contests this disclosure based upon the grounds of confidentiality and that there is a lack of relevancy. By an Order dated September 5,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lugosch v. CongelDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- Convolve, Inc. v. Compaq Computer Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2004