Legal Opinion

Owl Drug Co. v. Crandall

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1938No. Civil No. 3950PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

Eugene F. Crandall and Martha Crandall, husband and wife, brought this action against the Owl Drug Company for damages for personal injuries sustained by the wife Martha, in the defendant’s drug store in Phoenix, from a fall which it is claimed it was the duty of defendant’s servants and agents to prevent, and which by the exercise of reasonable care they could have prevented.

At the close of plaintiffs’ case, and at the close of the whole case, defendant moved for a directed verdict on the grounds (1) that there was no evidence that defendant or its agents were guilty of any negligence and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Fisher v. Butte Electric Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Katskee v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Brown v. MacPherson's, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. McDonough v. Buckeye S. S. Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1951
  3. Taylor v. Roosevelt Irr. Dist.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Splinter v. City of NampaIdaho Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Marsalis v. La SalleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API