Legal Opinion
General Motors Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Cities Service Gas Company, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 11, 1979No. 78-1101PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Chief Judge.
General Motors seeks a review of two orders entered by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Docket No. RP75-62— Cities Service Gas Company. One is titled “Order Clarifying Prior Order” and dated December 12, 1977, and the second is a February 8, 1978, Order Denying Rehearing. The orders were entered during the course of hearings on the Cities Service Gas Company’s plan for curtailment of service on its pipeline system. Other aspects of the plan and hearings before this court are referred to in State Corporation Commission of Kansas, et al. v. F. E. R. C. (10th Cir. No.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Public Service Company and Arizona Power Authority, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Cities of Anaheim and Riverside, California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southern California Edison Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Cities of Anaheim and Riverside, California v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Southern California Edison Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- General Motors Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Cities Service Gas Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979