United States v. Peck
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge.
Defendant’s timely objections [Doc. 37] to the Magistrate Judge’s Final Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) [Doc. 34] regarding Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Statements are currently before the Court. *1347The R & R recommends the denial of Defendant’s motion to suppress statements [Doc. 14]. It also recommends that Defendant’s motion to return property [Doc. 16] be deemed moot based on the agreement of the parties regarding resolution of the property issues.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 686(b)(1), the Court reviews any portion of the R & R that is the subject of a…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Yarborough v. AlvaradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State of Indiana v. Ernesto RuizIndiana Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. NewellOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
- United States v. BhattDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016