Legal Opinion

United States v. Bhatt

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided February 9, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-CR-313-ATPublished

1Opinion of the Court

*1361ORDER

Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge

Presently before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) [Doc. 40] recommending the denial of Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Statements [Docs. 11, 30].1 The Defendant has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R that challenge the Magistrate Judge’s mixed factual and legal findings that Defendant Varun Bhatt was not subject to coercion and de-facto arrest by the team of government agents2 investigating his offense conduct, and that the statements he provided to government agents was voluntarily provided. [Doc.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United States v. Augustin GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API