United States v. Bhatt
District Court, N.D. Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
*1361ORDER
Amy Totenberg, United States District Judge
Presently before the Court is the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) [Doc. 40] recommending the denial of Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Statements [Docs. 11, 30].1 The Defendant has filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s R&R that challenge the Magistrate Judge’s mixed factual and legal findings that Defendant Varun Bhatt was not subject to coercion and de-facto arrest by the team of government agents2 investigating his offense conduct, and that the statements he provided to government agents was voluntarily provided. [Doc.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Augustin GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.