Legal Opinion
Connors v. Boland
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided March 31, 1933PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.
The first action is to recover for personal injuries received by the plaintiff while riding as a guest in an automobile owned and operated by' Vincent J. Boland, the defendant’s intestate. The declaration is in two counts; the first alleges gross negligence, and the second wilful, wanton and reckless misconduct.
The second action is brought to recover for the conscious suffering and death of the plaintiff’s intestate. The amended declaration contains four counts: count 1 for the conscious suffering of Daly while riding in an automobile of the defendant’s intestate and caused by his gross…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Altman v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Cook v. ColeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Burke v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Marcienowski v. SandersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- McKenna v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Pittsley v. DavidMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Adamian v. MesserlianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Richards v. DonohueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
- Commonwealth v. DuffyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Dow v. LipsitzMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.