Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Duffy

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 19, 2004No. 03-P-1201PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. Denial of motion for required findings of not guilty. To establish guilt under the driving to endanger statute, G. L. c. 90, § 24(2)(a), the Commonwealth must prove that the defendant (1) operated a motor vehicle, (2) upon a public way, (3) (recklessly or) negligently so that the lives or safety of the public might be endangered.1 See Commonwealth v. Jones, 382 Mass. 387, 392 (1981). The defendant claims that there was a failure of proof as to the third factor — that he had operated a motor vehicle negligently so that the lives and safety of the public might be endangered.

The evidence…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. CampbellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Connors v. BolandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Commonwealth v. DinkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. GeislerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DaleyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006
  2. Commonwealth v. FerreiraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. FlanaganMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
  4. Commonwealth v. SousaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2015
  5. Commonwealth v. LabelleMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API