Casstevens v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.
While working as a car repairer in the repair shops of 'the Texas & Pacific Railway Company in the city of Port Worth, Albert Casstevens undertook to remove a nut from an iron bolt by using a hammer and chisel, and, while pounding on the chisel with a hard steel hammer which weighed about one and one-half or two pounds, a small piece of steel flew off the hammer and injured one of plain-, tiff’s fingers. After removal of his glove he extracted the sliver from his finger and continued work for some 14 days thereafter, at the termination of which period he was forced to cease work and procure…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Moore v. IveyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WashingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Pecos & Northern Texas Railway Co. v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Kalteyer v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Casstevens v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
- Kindy v. WillinghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- Scholz v. Handy Andy Community Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934