Kalteyer v. Mitchell
Texas Supreme Court
Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fourth District, in an appeal from Bexar County. Kalteyer and others sued Mitchell and others. Defendants had judgment. It was affirmed on appeal by plaintiffs, who then obtained writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gaines
This action was instituted August 25, 1904, by plaintiffs in error upon a promissory note for $800 given by Wallace Mitchell and Mattie Mitchell to George A. Schoenert, purporting to be for a part of the purchase money of a certain lot, payable December 23, 1897. The plaintiffs also pleaded that on the 23d day of December, 1901, the said Wallace Mitchell and Mattie Mitchell, in order to secure said lien, executed to George C. Altgelt a deed in trust upon -the said property empowering him, in default of the payment of said note on or before the 23d of December, 1903 (to which time the payment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rodriguez v. HaynesTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Dewees v. BluntzerTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Park v. Heirs of GloverTexas Supreme Court · 1859
- Muckleroy v. BethanyTexas Supreme Court · 1864
- Howell v. HanrickTexas Supreme Court · 1895
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Bradshaw v. AbramsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Andrews Et Ux. v. SEC. Bank of W. F.Texas Supreme Court · 1932
- Weatherford, M. W. & N. W. Ry. Co. v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Fox v. Houston & T. C. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- El Paso Electric Co. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.