Legal Opinion

Scholz v. Handy Andy Community Stores, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 1934No. 1247PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HICKMAN, Chief Justice.

It is not necessary to make an extended statement of this case. All of the propositions, except one, are without merit, and it would serve no purpose to discuss them. By this we are not to be understood as holding that some of the objections made to the charge might not have been well taken had they been presented timely to the lower court, but our holding with regard to them is that, assignments complaining of the charge of the court present nothing for review when the charge was not objected to as required by article 2185, R. S. 1926. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Casstevens v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. SparraCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Casstevens v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Duncan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API