Casstevens v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenwood
In this case, on motion for new trial, the undisputed testimony disclosed that a jury verdict was found in the following manner:
First: The initial vote by the jurymen on the first of more than twenty-six special issues resulted in three or four jurors voting to answer the question submitted in the affirmative and the remaining jurors voting to answer it in the negative.
Second: Argument among the jurors having failed to secure agreement on the true answer to the first question, the foreman suggested that each question be answered in accordance with the vote of a majority. The suggestion was…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. GrayTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Moore v. IveyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Southern Traction Co. v. WilsonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HarveyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- City of Houston v. QuinonesTexas Supreme Court · 1944
- Monkey Grip Rubber Co. v. WaltonTexas Supreme Court · 1932
- Sproles Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 1943
- Mills v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Watson v. Texas Indemnity InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1948
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.