Legal Opinion

Transcardiac Therapeutics, Inc. v. Yoganathan

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided February 28, 2014No. Civil Action No. 1:13-CV-3089-ATPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge.

Before the Court is Plaintiff TransCar-diac Therapeutics, Inc.’s Motion for Remand which explores the limits of federal patent jurisdiction over state law claims [Doc. 16]. Defendant Emory University removed this case based on the existence of federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a). In its Notice of Removal, Emory admits that none of Plaintiffs state law claims directly seek relief under federal patent law. Nevertheless, Emory argues that Plaintiffs Complaint necessarily implicates issues of patent inventorship, thereby establishing federal…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. TransCardiac Therapeutics, Inc. v. YoganathanDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
  2. Kim v. Dyna Flex, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
  3. SB IP Holdings LLC v. Vivint, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2021
  4. Sedat Cetindag v. Thomas P. Murphy, Jr.; Engin Yesil; Renco World Corporation; Renco USA, Inc. and Coastal Construction Group of South Florida, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API