Legal Opinion
TransCardiac Therapeutics, Inc. v. Yoganathan
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided November 14, 2014No. Civil Action No. 1:14-CV-00981-ATPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge.
This is the second time Defendants have removed this case. The Court previously remanded this, case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See TransCardiac Therapeutics, Inc. v. Yoganathan, 15 F.Supp.3d 1364 (N.D.Ga.2014). The Court explained that the state law claims in Plaintiff TransCardiac Therapeutics, Inc.’s (“TCT”) Complaint did not sufficiently implicate issues of patent inventorship and thus failed to establish federal jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a). Following remand, Defendants Emory University and Georgia Tech Research Corporation…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jerry Palmer v. Hospital Authority Of Randolph CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
- Pannu v. Iolab Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Mirowski Family Ventures, LLC.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Badhwa v. Veritec, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Davis v. Chatham Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2025