Legal Opinion
Kim v. Dyna Flex, Ltd.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided March 15, 2021No. 4:20-cv-01753Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION KI BEOM KIM, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 4:20-CV-01753-JAR ) DYNA FLEX, LTD., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Ki Beom Kim’s Motion to Remand. (Doc. 24).1 The motion is fully briefed. For the reasons discussed below, the motion will be denied. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND As alleged in the First Amended Petition, Plaintiff developed a self-ligation apparatus to connect to a coil-spring for an orthodontic archwire (the “Invention”). (Doc. 11 at ¶¶…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Prempro Products Liability Litigation v. WyethCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.