Legal Opinion

State v. Lavigne

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 18, 2010No. AC 29098PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DiPENTIMA, J.

The defendant, Kathleen Pamela Lavi-gne, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of larceny in the second degree by embezzlement from a person who is sixty years of age or older in violation of General Statutes § 53a-123 (a) (5). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the evidence was insufficient for conviction, (2) the court’s instructions to the jury were improper and (3) § 53a-123 (a) (5) is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the circumstances of this case. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The jury reasonably could have…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. State v. CalabreseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. PettigrewConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. State v. DojniaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  3. State v. HarrisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  4. State v. MansfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
  5. State v. DojniaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API