State v. Lavigne
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, J.
The defendant, Kathleen Pamela Lavi-gne, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of larceny in the second degree by embezzlement from a person who is sixty years of age or older in violation of General Statutes § 53a-123 (a) (5). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the evidence was insufficient for conviction, (2) the court’s instructions to the jury were improper and (3) § 53a-123 (a) (5) is unconstitutionally vague as applied to the circumstances of this case. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. CalabreseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. PettigrewConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. DojniaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. HarrisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. MansfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- State v. DojniaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.