Legal Opinion
State v. DeJesus
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 11, 2002No. SC 16326PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The defendant, Robert DeJesus, appeals from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a1 and conspiracy to commit murder in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-54a and 53a-48.2 On appeal, the defendant raises multiple challenges to the validity of his convictions. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. The defendant, Thunder Mongkosilapa and Dennis Alers, who were close friends, sold illegal drugs at 289 Grove Street in Waterbury. The defendant first met…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. DenbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- State v. RamosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. RomeroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- State v. OutingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. CutlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.