Legal Opinion
Judd v. City of St. Cloud
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 22, 1936No. 30,789PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 272 N.W. 577. Suit was brought by plaintiffs as a warrant-holders' committee on behalf of some 70 individuals who are owners of $287,800 of improvement revolving fund warrants issued by defendant city. The warrants involved are past due since October 1, 1929, and interest is unpaid since October 1, 1928.
Tried to the court, the findings were that the warrants are valid obligations and wholly unpaid; also that they are not general obligations of the city but payable solely out of special assessments for the particular improvement mentioned in each such warrant. Judgment in…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- German-American Savings Bank v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Interstate Trust Co. v. Montezuma Valley Irrigation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Noonan v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Peake v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- State ex rel. Oliver Iron Mining Co. v. City of ElySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Routh v. QuinnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Doyle v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Bergman v. Village of Golden ValleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937