Legal Opinion

Bergman v. Village of Golden Valley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 8, 1937No. 31,356PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Julius J. Olson, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for amended findings or if that be denied for a new trial.

The facts are not in issue. The sole difficulty hinges upon the law applicable thereto.

In 1931, upon appropriate petition duly made, an extensive area within the platted portion of defendant village was added to the then functioning watermain system. The village council duly adopted a resolution under the provisions of L. 1921, c. 4=25, 1 Mason Minn. St. 1927, §§ 1918-1 to 1918-14, inclusive, establishing the petitioned improvement, and in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Van Pelt v. BertilrudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  2. Pike v. City of MarshallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  3. Woodbridge v. Duluth CitySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  4. Leslie v. City of White Bear LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  5. Judd v. City of St. CloudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Otis v. ParrottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API