Legal Opinion
Battistoni v. Weatherking Products, Inc.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 4, 1996No. 14109PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.
The named plaintiff, Jana Battistoni,1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the named defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff alleges that the trial court improperly concluded (1) that the lack of adequate warnings was not a proximate cause of the accident and (2) that the dangers to the plaintiff of diving into the swimming pool were open and obvious. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly granted summary judgment by deciding these issues of material fact as a matter of law. We agree and reverse the trial court’s judgment.
The following facts are…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Connecticut Bank & Trust Co. v. Carriage Lane AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Zichichi v. Middlesex Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Yarchak v. Trek Bicycle Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Schratwieser v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Maffucci v. Royal Park Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- LORICCO TOWERS CONDOMINIUM ASS'N v. PantaniConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Moran v. Eastern Equipment Sales, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.