State v. Steen
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClare, C. J.
The evidence as to the guilt of the defendant is practically without exception, but the defendant insists that this matter as to the character of the witness is fatal. The defendant’s counsel, in his brief, raises no objection to the fact that the usual preliminary question was not put to this witness: “Do you know the general character of the witness Sapphire?” but bases his objection entirely upon the character of the testimony given in by Mr. Corpening, “Mr. Corpening swears that Sapphire’s character was good, and states the ground for his testi*770mony; tbat be made tbe trip to Atlanta, made…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. . GeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- State v. . Harvey PerkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- State v. . ColeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- State Ex Rel. Underwood, Marsh & Co. v. ParksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1843
- State v. . BoswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1829
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. AbernathySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. CrossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- State v. . KillianSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- State v. SiddenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. . RobertsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.