State v. Cross
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
COIL, Commissioner.
A jury found defendant guilty of first •degree robbery and fixed his punishment at five years in the penitentiary. Defendant 'has appealed from the ensuing judgment and inasmuch as he has filed no brief, we examine the four allegations of error in his motion for new trial. Those relate to the sufficiency of the information, the failure of the court to have admitted proffered evidence of defendant’s character and to have instructed thereon, and to the prose■cutor’s argument.
The state’s evidence tended to show that •defendant and another, just after noon on a •day in August…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tingley v. Times Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
- State v. FairlambSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- State v. TerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
- State v. KainSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. NewlonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- State v. FoulkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. ReillySupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- People v. BinghamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.