State v. Herrera
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBSON, Judge.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether a consecutive sentence is mandatory for a person convicted of attempted second-degree escape.
Defendant was originally convicted of aggravated robbery and sentenced to the Arizona Center for Women, a correctional facility. Before defendant completed her sentence, she escaped from the correctional facility. She was captured sometime thereafter and charged with second-degree escape in violation of A.R.S. § 13-2503.
Defendant entered into a plea agreement, as part of which she pled guilty to the lesser included offense of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. WaymanArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PenaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State v. LammieCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Cawley v. Arizona Bd. of Pardons and ParolesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- State v. HerreraArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. LammieCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990