Legal Opinion

Cawley v. Arizona Bd. of Pardons and Paroles

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 20, 1984No. 1 CA-CIV 7666PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREER, Judge.

The issue in this case is whether the Board of Pardons and Paroles exceeded its authority in ruling that, where an offender is paroled from a first sentence in order to begin serving a subsequent consecutive sentence, the parole period be held in abeyance until the release from the subsequent sentence. The trial court found that the Board had actbd within its authority, and granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss. We reverse.

The appellants are serving the second or last term of consecutive sentences. In addition, each was originally paroled from the first or interim…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. State v. PenaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  3. Howell v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re Application of FitzpatrickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  5. State v. PenaArizona Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Brock v. SullivanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. Cawley v. Arizona Board of Pardons and ParolesArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. SirnyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. Broadhead v. Arizona Board of Pardons & ParolesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API