Delaney v. . Vanness
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBrogden, J.
The plaintiff does not expressly allege in the complaint that Piedmont Park was the result of a general plan or scheme of residential development. But conceding that the complaint, when liberally construed, amounts to such allegation, yet the history of conveyances of the property would indicate that there was no such general plan or scheme as the law contemplates. Indeed, upon facts similar to the facts of the present record,, this "Court held in Davis v. Robinson, 189 N. C., 589, that Piedmont Park was not the result of a general and uniform plan, scheme or design. Upon the facts alleged in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Minister, Elders & Deacons of the Reformed Protestant Dutch Church v. Madison Avenue Building Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Satterthwait v. GibbsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Bailey v. Jackson-Campbell Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Virgin v. GarrettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- Schwarzschild v. WelborneSupreme Court of Virginia · 1947
- Hawthorne v. Realty Syndicate, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Andrews v. Metropolitan Building Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Charlotte Consolidated Construction Co. v. CobbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.