Schwarzschild v. Welborne
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.
The appellants are four of seven complainants who brought suit against the appellee, as defendant, to enjoin her from an alleged violation of a restrictive covenant in a deed in her title. The trial court refused to grant the injunction for the reason, as stated in a written opinion, that the defendant had not violated the covenant, and also, that under the facts and circumstances it would be inequitable to grant it.
No evidence, was taken but the facts were, agreed in two written stipulations, the first of which contains this paragraph:
“1. That the sole question to be determined in this cause *1054…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hutchinson v. UlrichIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Stevenson v. SpiveySupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Boston-Edison Protective Ass'n v. Paulist Fathers, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Deitrick v. LeadbetterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1940
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- J. T. Hobby & Son, Inc. v. Family Homes of Wake County, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Tvardek v. Powhatan Vill. Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2016
- Friedberg v. Riverpoint Building CommitteeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
- Booker v. Old Dominion Land Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1948
- Scott v. WalkerSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.