Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Jackson-Campbell Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 27, 1926PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The vital question is whether the defendants are prohibited by the restrictions in the deed from the Central Development Company to Sarah B. Pelton and in the deeds from E. W. Grove to the plaintiff and other purchasers from building the described apartment house on the lot known as the Pelton property. The plaintiff admits that he* derives title to the western portion of his lots from the Central Development Company and to the eastern portion from E. ~W. Grove. There is a marked difference in the phraseology of the restrictions embraced in the deeds of these respective grantors. The grantees…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Donahoe v. TurnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Myers Park Homes Co. v. FallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Higdon v. JaffaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Stegall v. Housing Authority of the City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Knadler v. AdamsWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Starkey v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Tull v. Doctors Building, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API