Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hurt v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 8, 2005No. 05-188 CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

HEWITT, Judge.

Before the court are plaintiffs Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) and plaintiffs complaint. Solely for the purpose of addressing whether the court has jurisdiction, the Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is GRANTED. The complaint, however, must be dismissed.

The jurisdictional statutes governing the United States Court of Federal Claims grant authority to the court only to issue judgments for money against the United States and then, only when a claim is grounded in a contract, a money-mandating statute, or certain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Arctic Corner, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  4. Wood-Ivey Systems Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  5. Ogden v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matthews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  2. McCullough v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Miller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Arakaki v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  5. Howard v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API