Legal Opinion
Arakaki v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 30, 2006No. 03-1874 CPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HEWITT, Judge.
This case is before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (RCFC) on *511the grounds that plaintiff has failed to demonstrate the requisite elements of a contract, the breach of which by the United States is the basis of plaintiffs’ claim. Defendant also moves the court to dismiss Helen Arakaki as a plaintiff for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.1
I. BACKGROUND
A. Procedural Background
On June 5, 2002 Edward T. Arakaki, as sole plaintiff, filed suit in Hawaii state court against…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Steinberg v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Mendez-Cardenas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Jordan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.