Legal Opinion

State v. Cook

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 20, 2008No. 33775PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERRY, Judge.

Jack K. Cook appeals from his judgment of conviction for infamous crime against nature, specifically challenging the constitutionality of the statute as applied to the facts of his case. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Cook performed fellatio on T.F., a male adult with Down’s Syndrome, in the sauna at a local gym. Cook was charged with one count of infamous crime against nature. I.C. § 18-6605. Cook filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the infamous crime against nature statute was unconstitutional, either facially or as applied. The district…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lawrence v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. State v. ColeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. KorsenIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. State v. KeeneSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  5. State v. IzattIdaho Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. ManzanaresIdaho Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. Morgan C. AlleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. Gomez-AlasIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  4. State v. Michael Jay FreitasIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State v. James W. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API